Typography
Typography is something I have never got. I think it is just a bit too artsy fartsy for my brain to take any notice of, which is a shame because I would really like to 'get' typography.
I mean I can appreciate that Comic Sans is a horrible font, and I think I know that Sans Serif means there are no little flicky bits on the lettering. But that is about the height of it.
Which is why I was pleased to be recently introduced to this blog post that contains different font and typeface cheat sheets. I must confess I haven't followed all the links yet, but from the ones I have there has been a wealth of information.
Looking Critically at Your Design
I read a post today that really opened my eyes to how you need to critically look at your design, or better still have a qualified yet unbiased third party do it for you.
Janko wrote about how he feels twitter needs another redesign and goes on to highlight the different sections he thinks just don't work. Now you may not agree with him (indeed a quick read of his comments tells you that a fair amount of people didn't) but it was the fact he was able to pick up on these issues and to ask questions about them.
Personally speaking I saw the new layout and the only thing that annoyed me was the login on the main page is different from the login when you are on a profile page, I wasn't looking at it critically enough to notice the things that he noticed. And if I can't look critically at an interface I use all the time yet have no real vested interest in, how I am supposed to look critically at the design of pages I do have an interest in?
Can you ever really look at a design with complete objectivity and highlight shortfalls? I don't think you can, and what is the next option? You could get friends or co-workers to look at the design, they will be more objective than you could be but they still won't be completely critical, human nature dictates that they just can't be. So do you pay for someone's design services and let them cast an eye over your work? If you do that then do you not stand a chance of getting back a list of changes that are only there to justify someone's fee?
It is all a bit complicated if you ask me.
Really cool dropdown menu
Janko - At Warp Speed is an excellent blog, and if you haven't subscribed to the feed for it then I really suggest you do.
One post that really grabbed me recently was named 'Reinventing a Dropdown with CSS and jQuery', not the most imaginative of titles I grant you, but the results of the supplied tutorial are just fantastic.

I must admit that my first thought was that reinventing stuff is usually a bad idea, I mean the dropdown element works fine, it is functional and most web users would know how to use one without needing to think about it so why go to the hassle of prettying it up a bit?
Well the thing is, they have prettied it up a lot and I think the inclusion of graphics makes it more accessible. Actually whilst I think about it, you may look at the first part of the code and dismiss it out of hand because it isn't very accessible (it uses <li> tags), however if you read on down they have included a way to achieve the same results with the normal <select> tag, so I don't know any reasons why this couldn't be incorporated into some web projects.
CSS Techniques Run Down
Now I am not going to be one of these people who only posts up apologies for never posting, but you may have noticed that a lot of my posts recently have just been linking to other peoples work and saying how much I agree with it. The reason I have been doing this is simply because there is a lot of quality articles out there, and whilst I do have every plan to create some of my own very soon I want to keep the site ticking over whilst I get my creative arse in gear!
So today I want to chat about the SM post entitled '50 New CSS Techniques For Your Next Web Design' it is a quality article (what else would you expect from Smashing Magazine) that basically runs down a list of blog posts and tutorials on how to achieve the very latest CSS things. As with a lot of their articles you could always argue that this is all information that is freely available and perhaps that most web designers should already be taking for granted but the fact of the matter is that with so much new stuff constantly coming out, and so many people finding new ways of doing things these run downs are incredibly useful.
Things that I found especially interesting / useful were;
- Compressing JavaScript and CSS.
- Useful layout tips and tricks.
- Multiple Backgrounds.
- A whole lot more.
I would really suggest you bookmark this article and really spend time going through each of the sections.
About Pages – Are they totally necessary?
I was recently reading an article by Smashing Magazine on the subject of best practices for designing about me pages and whilst there is no arguments from me that some of the About pages on display look fantastic I am a little dubious of their opening statement.
The “about me”-page is one of the most overlooked pages in development and one of the highest ranked pages on many websites. In a world that’s becoming increasingly connected through the Web, it’s important that you engage your audience in a personal and friendly way, otherwise you risk just being another faceless web designer among a sea of websites.
I agree that you need to engage your audience, and the more personal you make that the better. However I don't think an About Me page is the place to be doing it.
Most people include the following information in their About Me section;
- A small mission statement.
- General information about them (stats and hobbies).
- A small blurb on work they have done.
If a mission statement is to be included on your site I would argue that it is too important to be hidden in an about me page, it should appear perhaps in the footer of the site or somewhere of prominence, I don't think I would go looking for a mission statement so if you need someone to see yours you can't leave it to chance.
The general information is perhaps the most included bit of information found in most About Me sections, this is where people try to make themselves stand out above the rest, this is obviously far more crucial for designers than it is developers, however again I feel that getting your personality across is something that is too important to just put into one page, the entire site needs to sweat your personality, it needs to soak into the person viewing the site regardless of what page they are on. Once you have got your personality across things like vital statistics (age, sex etc) aren't really that necessary and are small enough in volume that you could probably place them somewhere else on your site.
The small blurb on work you have done is something I have seen more and more in About Me sections, and I really don't agree with it being there at all. If you have a portfolio of work you want to show off then you need to have a portfolio section, there you can talk in brief or in depth about work you have done. Again, you site should scream that you are a competent designer/developer/seoer/whateverer so you should either be backing up the claims implied by your site with a full blown portfolio showing a body of work, or nothing.
Another point I would like to make is a lot of people would say their main call to action on a site would be to get the user to contact them, and with more and more people offering things like Twitter and Facebook as contact mediums, there is really no need to include a personal bio on your site, users can easily see that on the various social sites you have already written stuff on.
Of course I could be totally wrong, perhaps the About Me section *is* vital and the information stored in it helps potential clients/partners see the real you. Let me know in the comments!